NEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
nOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAI RFCORDS
rer PeAc©l e1liTe 100
701 5. COURTHOUSE Ikwsi™:
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24990
JSR
Docket No: NR5291-14
20 November 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 2552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material gubmitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 9 April and 16 September 2014, copies
of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the reports of the
PERB. Accordingly, your application bas been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence 15 evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. tn this regard, 1t
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9925 14
JSR Docket No: NR9925-14 fu November
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4711 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within New evidence is prior to making is important to attaches to all one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8269 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2716 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 20:4. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8514 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitte support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4757 14
You requested removing the fitness report for 2 March to 30 June 2013. , Tt is noted that CMC has directed filing in your record copies of your four letters of appreciation (LOA’s) dated 20 April, 4 May, 5 June and 12 June 2013, and modifying the contested fitness report by marking section A, item 6.a (*Commendatory Material”) and adding to section I (reporting senior’s SPArecced: an@ Additional Comments”) ‘Directed Comment: received four LOA’s for volunteer community service.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9151 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 August 2014, and the advisory opinion from HOQMC dated 8 September 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9928 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) , dated 20 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. Consequently,...